IVV vs RSPE

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. RSPE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: RSPEMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRSPEWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.20%
AUM$865.2B$68M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.46%
Holdings508188
YTD Return+13.13%+16.42%
1Y Return+22.90%+27.91%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.08%+15.58%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-22.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 17, 2021

IVV vs RSPE Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% while RSPE returned +27.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.13% versus a gain of 16.42% for RSPE.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.08% per year against +15.58% for RSPE. Across the full 5-year window we track, RSPE has the edge at +9.03% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RSPE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.9% for RSPE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPE charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.46% for RSPE.

Holdings Overlap

23.6%overlap

IVV and RSPE share 179 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RSPEDifference
NVDA7.76%0.51%7.25%
MSFT4.57%0.49%4.08%
GOOGL3.15%0.29%2.86%
GOOGProProPro
MUProProPro
VProProPro
INTCProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CATProProPro
WMTProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RSPE
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPE?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPE charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or RSPE?

Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% vs +27.91% for RSPE, so RSPE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +9.03% for RSPE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or RSPE?

RSPE has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPE -22.9%.

Should I hold both IVV and RSPE?

IVV and RSPE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPE?

IVV and RSPE share 179 common holdings with a 23.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPE?

IVV yields 1.09% while RSPE yields 1.46%, so RSPE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →