IVV vs RND
IVV vs RND
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +10.61% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +21.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 30, 2024 |
IVV vs RND Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF (RND) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while RND returned +21.60%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 10.61% for RND.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.5% for RND. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RND charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for RND.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RND share 46 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 44.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 7.44% | 8.45% | 1.01% |
| NVDA | 7.76% | 8.01% | 0.25% |
| GOOGL | 3.15% | 8.61% | 5.46% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RND Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RND?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RND charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RND?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +21.60% for RND, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +26.78% for RND. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RND?
RND has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RND -23.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and RND?
IVV and RND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RND?
IVV and RND share 46 common holdings with a 44.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RND?
IVV yields 1.09% while RND yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.