IVV vs RECS

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRECSWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.15%
AUM$865.2B$5.9B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.05%
Holdings508368
YTD Return+13.80%+10.57%
1Y Return+23.70%+20.40%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+21.30%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+13.77%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Columbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 25, 2019

IVV vs RECS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while RECS returned +20.40%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 10.57% for RECS.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +21.30% for RECS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +13.77% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RECS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -34.3% for RECS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RECS charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.05% for RECS.

Holdings Overlap

45.5%overlap

IVV and RECS share 174 holdings out of 691 unique holdings combined, representing a 45.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RECSDifference
NVDA7.76%9.06%1.30%
AAPL7.44%8.40%0.96%
MSFT4.57%6.30%1.73%
GOOGProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
METAProProPro
XOMProProPro
PGProProPro
AMDProProPro
WFCProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RECS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RECS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RECS charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or RECS?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +20.40% for RECS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +4.01% for RECS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or RECS?

RECS has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RECS -34.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and RECS?

IVV and RECS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RECS?

IVV and RECS share 174 common holdings with a 45.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 691 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RECS?

IVV yields 1.09% while RECS yields 1.05%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →