IVV vs RBLD

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVRBLDWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.65%
AUM$865.2B$57M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.03%
Holdings508104
YTD Return+13.31%+17.29%
1Y Return+24.00%+21.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+19.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-19.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 13, 2008

IVV vs RBLD Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while RBLD returned +21.46%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 17.29% for RBLD.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +19.54% for RBLD. Across the full 4-year window we track, RBLD has the edge at +17.15% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RBLD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.1% for RBLD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while RBLD charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.03% for RBLD.

Holdings Overlap

7.7%overlap

IVV and RBLD share 82 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in RBLDDifference
CAT0.63%0.94%0.31%
GEV0.45%0.94%0.49%
UNP0.27%1.07%0.80%
NEEProProPro
MMMProProPro
PHProProPro
WABProProPro
CEGProProPro
SLBProProPro
CSXProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with RBLD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or RBLD?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RBLD charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or RBLD?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +21.46% for RBLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +17.15% for RBLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or RBLD?

RBLD has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RBLD -19.1%.

Should I hold both IVV and RBLD?

IVV and RBLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RBLD?

IVV and RBLD share 82 common holdings with a 7.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RBLD?

IVV yields 1.09% while RBLD yields 1.03%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →