IVV vs RAAX
IVV vs RAAX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RAAX delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RAAX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.07% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 18 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +14.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +29.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +19.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | +13.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -33.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 9, 2018 |
IVV vs RAAX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Real Assets ETF (RAAX) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while RAAX returned +29.63%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 14.68% for RAAX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +19.04% for RAAX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +13.79% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, RAAX has the edge at +9.14% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.7% for RAAX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.9% for RAAX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RAAX charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.07% for RAAX.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RAAX share 0 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RAAX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RAAX charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RAAX?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +29.63% for RAAX, so RAAX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +9.14% for RAAX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RAAX?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.7% for RAAX. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RAAX -33.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RAAX?
IVV and RAAX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RAAX?
IVV and RAAX share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RAAX?
IVV yields 1.09% while RAAX yields 2.07%, so RAAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.