IVV vs RAAA
IVV vs RAAA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RAAA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $35M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.78% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 46 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +2.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +4.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -0.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Reckoner Capital Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 9, 2025 |
IVV vs RAAA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) is a ETF from Reckoner Capital Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while RAAA returned +4.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 2.54% for RAAA.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.2% for RAAA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -0.7% for RAAA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RAAA charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $30 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.78% for RAAA.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RAAA share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RAAA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RAAA charges 0.30%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RAAA?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +4.82% for RAAA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +4.81% for RAAA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RAAA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.2% for RAAA. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RAAA -0.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and RAAA?
IVV and RAAA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RAAA?
IVV and RAAA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RAAA?
IVV yields 1.09% while RAAA yields 4.78%, so RAAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.