IVV vs QQHG
IVV vs QQHG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQHG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $13M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.26% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 265 | |
| YTD Return | +13.52% | +10.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +20.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.52% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -6.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 7, 2025 |
IVV vs QQHG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while QQHG returned +20.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 10.91% for QQHG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.0% for QQHG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -6.2% for QQHG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQHG charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.26% for QQHG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQHG share 144 holdings out of 578 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.7% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QQHG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.76% | 7.61% | 0.15% |
| AAPL | 7.44% | 6.84% | 0.60% |
| MSFT | 4.57% | 4.79% | 0.22% |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with QQHG Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQHG charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQHG?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +20.04% for QQHG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +26.33% for QQHG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQHG?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.0% for QQHG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQHG -6.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQHG?
IVV and QQHG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQHG?
IVV and QQHG share 144 common holdings with a 52.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 578 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQHG?
IVV yields 1.09% while QQHG yields 0.26%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.