IVV vs PYLD
IVV vs PYLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. PYLD offers more diversification with 666 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.64% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $15.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.26% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,576 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +5.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +7.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 4.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -4.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 21, 2023 |
IVV vs PYLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) is a ETF from PIMCO (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while PYLD returned +5.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 0.71% for PYLD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +7.75% for PYLD. Across the full 3-year window we track, PYLD has the edge at +7.62% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.9% for PYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.5% for PYLD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PYLD charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $64 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.26% for PYLD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PYLD share 0 holdings out of 1171 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PYLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PYLD charges 0.64%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PYLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +5.34% for PYLD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +7.62% for PYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PYLD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.9% for PYLD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PYLD -4.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and PYLD?
IVV and PYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PYLD?
IVV and PYLD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1171 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PYLD?
IVV yields 1.09% while PYLD yields 6.26%, so PYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.