IVV vs PTRB
IVV vs PTRB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PGIM Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. PTRB offers more diversification with 724 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTRB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.51% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,478 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | -0.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +3.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +4.68% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PGIM Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 2, 2021 |
IVV vs PTRB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) is a ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while PTRB returned +3.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a loss of 0.40% for PTRB.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +4.68% for PTRB. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs +0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.2% for PTRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.2% for PTRB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTRB charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.51% for PTRB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTRB share 1 holdings out of 1228 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PTRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GS | 0.50% | 0.01% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTRB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTRB charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTRB?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +3.10% for PTRB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +0.07% for PTRB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTRB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.2% for PTRB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTRB -19.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTRB?
IVV and PTRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTRB?
IVV and PTRB share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1228 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTRB?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTRB yields 5.51%, so PTRB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.