IVV vs PTBD
IVV vs PTBD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. PTBD offers more diversification with 677 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTBD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $85M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.89% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 901 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | +1.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.48% | +1.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.86% | +4.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | -1.80% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -26.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 22, 2019 |
IVV vs PTBD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while PTBD returned +1.96%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 1.19% for PTBD.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +4.73% for PTBD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and -1.80% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.2% for PTBD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -26.0% for PTBD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTBD charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.89% for PTBD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTBD share 0 holdings out of 1182 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTBD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTBD charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTBD?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +1.96% for PTBD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +0.39% for PTBD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTBD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.2% for PTBD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTBD -26.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTBD?
IVV and PTBD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTBD?
IVV and PTBD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1182 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTBD?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTBD yields 5.89%, so PTBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.