IVV vs NUSC

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. NUSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: NUSCMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNUSCWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.31%
AUM$865.2B$1.3B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.90%
Holdings508440
YTD Return+13.31%+16.65%
1Y Return+24.00%+29.42%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+12.87%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+5.86%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%21.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-41.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Nuveen
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 13, 2016

IVV vs NUSC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while NUSC returned +29.42%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 16.65% for NUSC.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +12.87% for NUSC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +5.86% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, NUSC has the edge at +10.12% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NUSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.5% for NUSC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NUSC charges 0.31%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $31 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.90% for NUSC.

Holdings Overlap

0.3%overlap

IVV and NUSC share 16 holdings out of 922 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NUSCDifference
MRNA0.03%1.26%1.23%
HST0.02%1.01%0.99%
PR0.62%0.02%0.60%
FDSProProPro
GNRCProProPro
HASProProPro
NCLHProProPro
IVZProProPro
BENProProPro
GLProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with NUSC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NUSC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NUSC charges 0.31%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NUSC?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +29.42% for NUSC, so NUSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +10.12% for NUSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or NUSC?

NUSC has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NUSC -41.5%.

Should I hold both IVV and NUSC?

IVV and NUSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NUSC?

IVV and NUSC share 16 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 922 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NUSC?

IVV yields 1.09% while NUSC yields 0.90%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →