IVV vs NIE

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNIEWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%1.07%
AUM$865.2B$797M
Dividend Yield1.09%8.66%
Holdings508196
YTD Return+13.31%+9.93%
1Y Return+24.00%+21.18%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+17.52%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+9.59%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-63.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityAllocation/Balanced
InceptionMay 15, 2000Feb 27, 2007

IVV vs NIE Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Virtus Equity & Convertible Income Fund (NIE) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while NIE returned +21.18%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 9.93% for NIE.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +17.52% for NIE; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +9.59% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NIE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -63.8% for NIE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NIE charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.66% for NIE.

Holdings Overlap

44.3%overlap

IVV and NIE share 90 holdings out of 576 unique holdings combined, representing a 44.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NIEDifference
NVDA7.76%5.65%2.11%
AAPL7.44%4.55%2.89%
MSFT4.57%3.16%1.41%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
GOOGProProPro
MUProProPro
LITEProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with NIE
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NIE?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NIE charges 1.07%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NIE?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +21.18% for NIE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +3.59% for NIE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or NIE?

NIE has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NIE -63.8%.

Should I hold both IVV and NIE?

IVV and NIE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NIE?

IVV and NIE share 90 common holdings with a 44.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 576 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NIE?

IVV yields 1.09% while NIE yields 8.66%, so NIE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →