IVV vs NCV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. NCV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: NCVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVNCVWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%1.45%
AUM$865.2B$418M
Dividend Yield1.09%8.42%
Holdings508220
YTD Return+13.80%+19.59%
1Y Return+23.70%+31.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+21.20%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+4.52%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%26.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-84.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityConvertible
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 31, 2003

IVV vs NCV Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Virtus Convertible & Income Fund (NCV) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while NCV returned +31.88%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 19.59% for NCV.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +21.20% for NCV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +4.52% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -84.8% for NCV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while NCV charges 1.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $145 annually, a gap of $142 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.42% for NCV.

Holdings Overlap

3.4%overlap

IVV and NCV share 27 holdings out of 575 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in NCVDifference
LITE0.10%3.80%3.70%
WDC0.29%2.64%2.35%
BA0.25%1.75%1.50%
NEEProProPro
AMDProProPro
LYVProProPro
ORCLProProPro
PCGProProPro
STXProProPro
SOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with NCV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or NCV?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NCV charges 1.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $142 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or NCV?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +31.88% for NCV, so NCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs -2.63% for NCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or NCV?

NCV has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NCV -84.8%.

Should I hold both IVV and NCV?

IVV and NCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NCV?

IVV and NCV share 27 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 575 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NCV?

IVV yields 1.09% while NCV yields 8.42%, so NCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →