IVV vs NBTR
IVV vs NBTR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.37% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $54M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 5.53% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 435 | |
| YTD Return | +13.31% | +0.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.00% | +3.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 3.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -2.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Neuberger Berman | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 17, 2024 |
IVV vs NBTR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF (NBTR) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while NBTR returned +3.16%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 0.33% for NBTR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.2% for NBTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -2.6% for NBTR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBTR charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 5.53% for NBTR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NBTR share 0 holdings out of 730 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBTR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBTR charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NBTR?
Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +3.16% for NBTR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +4.88% for NBTR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBTR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.2% for NBTR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NBTR -2.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NBTR?
IVV and NBTR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NBTR?
IVV and NBTR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 730 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBTR?
IVV yields 1.09% while NBTR yields 5.53%, so NBTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.