IVV vs MMTM

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. MMTM offers more diversification with 1480 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: MMTM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMMTMWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.12%
AUM$865.2B$159M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.86%
Holdings5081,488
YTD Return+13.31%+5.90%
1Y Return+24.00%+14.78%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+19.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+11.81%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%14.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-34.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 24, 2012

IVV vs MMTM Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while MMTM returned +14.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 5.90% for MMTM.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +19.02% for MMTM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, MMTM has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for MMTM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -34.2% for MMTM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MMTM charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.86% for MMTM.

Holdings Overlap

68.9%overlap

IVV and MMTM share 490 holdings out of 1495 unique holdings combined, representing a 68.9% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MMTMDifference
AAPL7.44%6.46%0.98%
MSFT4.57%7.72%3.15%
NVDA7.76%3.37%4.39%
AMZNProProPro
METAProProPro
AVGOProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MMTM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MMTM?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MMTM charges 0.12%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MMTM?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +14.78% for MMTM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +13.14% for MMTM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MMTM?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for MMTM. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MMTM -34.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and MMTM?

IVV and MMTM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MMTM?

IVV and MMTM share 490 common holdings with a 68.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1495 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MMTM?

IVV yields 1.09% while MMTM yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →