IVV vs MMSC

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. MMSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: MMSCMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMMSCWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.95%
AUM$865.2B$51M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.00%
Holdings508202
YTD Return+13.31%+17.19%
1Y Return+24.00%+35.89%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+20.79%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%21.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-40.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 13, 2021

IVV vs MMSC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while MMSC returned +35.89%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 17.19% for MMSC.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +20.79% for MMSC. Across the full 5-year window we track, MMSC has the edge at +7.16% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MMSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -40.8% for MMSC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MMSC charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for MMSC.

Holdings Overlap

0.3%overlap

IVV and MMSC share 7 holdings out of 706 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MMSCDifference
BLDR0.01%1.34%1.33%
COHR0.10%0.58%0.48%
LITE0.10%0.47%0.37%
TECHProProPro
GNRCProProPro
PODDProProPro
CIENProProPro
See all 7 holdings IVV shares with MMSC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MMSC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MMSC charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MMSC?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +35.89% for MMSC, so MMSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +7.16% for MMSC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MMSC?

MMSC has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MMSC -40.8%.

Should I hold both IVV and MMSC?

IVV and MMSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MMSC?

IVV and MMSC share 7 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 706 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MMSC?

IVV yields 1.09% while MMSC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →