IVV vs MFUS

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. MFUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. MFUS offers more diversification with 844 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: MFUSMore Diversified: MFUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMFUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.29%
AUM$865.2B$296M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.37%
Holdings508858
YTD Return+9.93%+15.14%
1Y Return+19.59%+24.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.41%+19.24%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.89%+12.89%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%15.7%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-35.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)PIMCO (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 31, 2017

IVV vs MFUS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF (MFUS) is a ETF from PIMCO (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while MFUS returned +24.56%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 15.14% for MFUS.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +19.24% for MFUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, MFUS has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MFUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -35.2% for MFUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MFUS charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.37% for MFUS.

Holdings Overlap

43.8%overlap

IVV and MFUS share 361 holdings out of 988 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MFUSDifference
AAPL7.44%1.27%6.17%
NVDA7.76%0.73%7.03%
AVGO2.83%2.09%0.74%
INTCProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
WMTProProPro
JNJProProPro
XOMProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MFUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MFUS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MFUS charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MFUS?

Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +24.56% for MFUS, so MFUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +12.53% for MFUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MFUS?

MFUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MFUS -35.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and MFUS?

IVV and MFUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MFUS?

IVV and MFUS share 361 common holdings with a 43.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 988 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MFUS?

IVV yields 1.09% while MFUS yields 1.37%, so MFUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →