IVV vs LODI
IVV vs LODI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LODI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $96M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.99% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 148 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | +2.32% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +4.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 3, 2024 |
IVV vs LODI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while LODI returned +4.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 2.32% for LODI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.3% for LODI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.0% for LODI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LODI charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.99% for LODI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LODI share 0 holdings out of 558 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LODI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LODI charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LODI?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +4.99% for LODI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +5.22% for LODI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LODI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.3% for LODI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LODI -1.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and LODI?
IVV and LODI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LODI?
IVV and LODI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 558 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LODI?
IVV yields 1.09% while LODI yields 4.99%, so LODI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.