IVV vs KNCT

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. KNCT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: KNCTMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVKNCTWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.40%
AUM$865.2B$155M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.60%
Holdings508112
YTD Return+13.13%+43.02%
1Y Return+22.90%+67.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.08%+37.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%+16.86%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%22.3%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-57.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 23, 2005

IVV vs KNCT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% while KNCT returned +67.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.13% versus a gain of 43.02% for KNCT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.08% per year against +37.25% for KNCT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +16.86% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, KNCT has the edge at +13.18% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

KNCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -57.2% for KNCT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while KNCT charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.60% for KNCT.

Holdings Overlap

18.2%overlap

IVV and KNCT share 38 holdings out of 566 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in KNCTDifference
AAPL7.44%7.34%0.10%
MU1.69%8.86%7.17%
AVGO2.83%7.45%4.62%
INTCProProPro
CSCOProProPro
PANWProProPro
MRVLProProPro
CRWDProProPro
ANETProProPro
VZProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with KNCT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or KNCT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KNCT charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or KNCT?

Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% vs +67.90% for KNCT, so KNCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +13.18% for KNCT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or KNCT?

KNCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KNCT -57.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and KNCT?

IVV and KNCT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KNCT?

IVV and KNCT share 38 common holdings with a 18.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 566 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KNCT?

IVV yields 1.09% while KNCT yields 0.60%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →