IVV vs JPST
IVV vs JPST
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. JPST offers more diversification with 535 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JPST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $40.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 794 | |
| YTD Return | +9.93% | +1.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +4.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.41% | +5.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89% | +3.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 1.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -3.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 17, 2017 |
IVV vs JPST Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while JPST returned +4.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 1.89% for JPST.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +5.10% for JPST; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +3.71% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs +2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.1% for JPST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -3.3% for JPST. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JPST charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.55% for JPST.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JPST share 1 holdings out of 1039 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JPST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIS | 0.26% | 0.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JPST?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JPST charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JPST?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +4.10% for JPST, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +2.19% for JPST. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JPST?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.1% for JPST. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JPST -3.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and JPST?
IVV and JPST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JPST?
IVV and JPST share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1039 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JPST?
IVV yields 1.09% while JPST yields 4.55%, so JPST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.