IVV vs JBBB
IVV vs JBBB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JBBB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.47% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 8.11% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 217 | |
| YTD Return | +13.52% | -0.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +0.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.26% | +7.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.52% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Janus Henderson Investors | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 11, 2022 |
IVV vs JBBB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) is a ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while JBBB returned +0.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a loss of 0.64% for JBBB.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +7.43% for JBBB. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.0% for JBBB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.6% for JBBB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JBBB charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $47 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.11% for JBBB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JBBB share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JBBB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JBBB charges 0.47%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JBBB?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +0.34% for JBBB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +5.80% for JBBB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JBBB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.0% for JBBB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JBBB -10.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and JBBB?
IVV and JBBB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JBBB?
IVV and JBBB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JBBB?
IVV yields 1.09% while JBBB yields 8.11%, so JBBB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.