IVV vs IYC

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVIYCWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.38%
AUM$865.2B$1.1B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.51%
Holdings508162
YTD Return+13.52%+0.43%
1Y Return+23.63%+4.11%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+13.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+6.44%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-54.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 12, 2000

IVV vs IYC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while IYC returned +4.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 0.43% for IYC.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +13.08% for IYC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +6.44% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IYC has the edge at +7.81% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IYC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -54.0% for IYC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while IYC charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.51% for IYC.

Holdings Overlap

12.3%overlap

IVV and IYC share 71 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in IYCDifference
AMZN3.75%14.27%10.52%
TSLA1.65%8.70%7.05%
WMT0.75%4.14%3.39%
COSTProProPro
HDProProPro
NFLXProProPro
MCDProProPro
DISProProPro
TJXProProPro
UBERProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with IYC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or IYC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IYC charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or IYC?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +4.11% for IYC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +7.81% for IYC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or IYC?

IYC has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IYC -54.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and IYC?

IVV and IYC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IYC?

IVV and IYC share 71 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IYC?

IVV yields 1.09% while IYC yields 0.51%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →