IVV vs IXG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IXGMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVIXGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.41%
AUM$865.2B$674M
Dividend Yield1.09%2.27%
Holdings508247
YTD Return+9.93%+10.83%
1Y Return+19.59%+22.54%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.41%+24.35%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.89%+14.82%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%21.0%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-80.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 12, 2001

IVV vs IXG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% while IXG returned +22.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 9.93% versus a gain of 10.83% for IXG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +19.41% per year against +24.35% for IXG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +14.82% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.91% annualized vs +4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -80.0% for IXG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while IXG charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $41 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.27% for IXG.

Holdings Overlap

10.8%overlap

IVV and IXG share 73 holdings out of 654 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in IXGDifference
JPM1.43%5.84%4.41%
V0.91%3.82%2.91%
MA0.67%2.77%2.10%
BACProProPro
GSProProPro
WFCProProPro
MSProProPro
CProProPro
AXPProProPro
SCHWProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with IXG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or IXG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IXG charges 0.41%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or IXG?

Over the past year IVV returned +19.59% vs +22.54% for IXG, so IXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +6.91% vs +4.51% for IXG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or IXG?

IXG has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IXG -80.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and IXG?

IVV and IXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IXG?

IVV and IXG share 73 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IXG?

IVV yields 1.09% while IXG yields 2.27%, so IXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →