IVV vs IWS

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IWS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWS offers more diversification with 698 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IWSMore Diversified: IWS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVIWSWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.23%
AUM$865.2B$15.6B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.32%
Holdings508724
YTD Return+11.54%+19.08%
1Y Return+21.48%+26.26%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.86%+16.41%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.02%+9.57%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-63.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 17, 2001

IVV vs IWS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Russell Mid-cap Value ETF (IWS) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while IWS returned +26.26%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a gain of 19.08% for IWS.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +16.41% for IWS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +9.57% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IWS has the edge at +8.23% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -63.9% for IWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while IWS charges 0.23%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $23 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.32% for IWS.

Holdings Overlap

11.5%overlap

IVV and IWS share 274 holdings out of 929 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in IWSDifference
PSX0.13%0.65%0.52%
PR0.62%0.12%0.50%
ALL0.10%0.62%0.52%
DLRProProPro
WBDProProPro
KMIProProPro
HPEProProPro
OProProPro
CTVAProProPro
DALProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with IWS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or IWS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IWS charges 0.23%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or IWS?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +26.26% for IWS, so IWS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +8.23% for IWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or IWS?

IWS has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IWS -63.9%.

Should I hold both IVV and IWS?

IVV and IWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IWS?

IVV and IWS share 274 common holdings with a 11.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 929 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IWS?

IVV yields 1.09% while IWS yields 1.32%, so IWS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →