IVOG vs VOO
IVOG vs VOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IVOG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVOG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 246 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.77% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.47% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.28% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.10% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IVOG vs VOO Performance
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVOG returned +25.47% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, IVOG is up 17.77% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Over three years, IVOG compounded at +15.28% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.10% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for IVOG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVOG charges 0.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVOG currently yields 0.81% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IVOG and VOO share 0 holdings out of 750 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVOG or VOO?
IVOG has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVOG or VOO?
Over the past year IVOG returned +25.47% vs +22.88% for VOO, so IVOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVOG annualized +12.48% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVOG or VOO?
IVOG has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IVOG -39.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IVOG and VOO?
IVOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVOG and VOO?
IVOG and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 750 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVOG or VOO?
IVOG yields 0.81% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.