IQLT vs VOO
IQLT vs VOO
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IQLT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQLT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13.6B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 325 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.89% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.74% | +19.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +19.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.68% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IQLT vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IQLT returned +23.74% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, IQLT is up 10.89% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.
Over three years, IQLT compounded at +14.52% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.68% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IQLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.2% for IQLT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQLT charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQLT currently yields 2.41% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQLT or VOO?
IQLT has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IQLT or VOO?
Over the past year IQLT returned +23.74% vs +19.58% for VOO, so IQLT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IQLT annualized +7.27% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IQLT or VOO?
IQLT has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IQLT -32.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IQLT and VOO?
IQLT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IQLT and VOO?
IQLT and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQLT or VOO?
IQLT yields 2.41% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IQLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.