IQLT vs IVV
IQLT vs IVV
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQLT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQLT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13.6B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 325 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.89% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.74% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.68% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
IQLT vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IQLT returned +23.74% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, IQLT is up 10.89% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Over three years, IQLT compounded at +14.52% per year against +19.41% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.68% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IQLT has the edge at +7.27% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for IQLT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.2% for IQLT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQLT charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQLT currently yields 2.41% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IQLT and IVV share 3 holdings out of 797 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQLT or IVV?
IQLT has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IQLT or IVV?
Over the past year IQLT returned +23.74% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IQLT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IQLT annualized +7.27% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IQLT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for IQLT. Worst drawdown: IQLT -32.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IQLT and IVV?
IQLT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IQLT and IVV?
IQLT and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQLT or IVV?
IQLT yields 2.41% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IQLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.