INTL vs IVV
INTL vs IVV
Main International ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INTL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.84% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $230M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.38% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +9.25% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.45% | +22.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.56% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
INTL vs IVV Performance
Main International ETF (INTL) is a ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year INTL returned +18.45% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, INTL is up 9.25% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.
Over three years, INTL compounded at +14.56% per year against +21.08% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, INTL has the edge at +14.37% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for INTL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for INTL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INTL charges 0.84% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $84 vs $3 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INTL currently yields 3.38% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
INTL and IVV share 0 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INTL or IVV?
INTL has an expense ratio of 0.84% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INTL or IVV?
Over the past year INTL returned +18.45% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), INTL annualized +14.37% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INTL or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for INTL. Worst drawdown: INTL -14.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both INTL and IVV?
INTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INTL and IVV?
INTL and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INTL or IVV?
INTL yields 3.38% while IVV yields 1.09%, so INTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.