IGA vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IGA offers more diversification with 237 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: IGA

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIGAQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.97%0.18%
AUM$157M$455.8B
Dividend Yield9.62%0.41%
Holdings516108
YTD Return+9.65%+17.27%
1Y Return+16.41%+28.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.12%+24.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.73%+14.86%
Volatility (annualized)16.0%30.6%
Max Drawdown-72.2%-83.0%
Fund FamilyVoya Investment ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 26, 2005Mar 10, 1999

IGA vs QQQ Performance

Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) is a ETF from Voya Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IGA returned +16.41% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, IGA is up 9.65% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.

Over three years, IGA compounded at +18.12% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.73% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs -0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.0% for IGA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.2% for IGA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IGA charges 0.97% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $18 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGA currently yields 9.62% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

10.9%overlap

IGA and QQQ share 17 holdings out of 323 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IGAWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA0.09%7.88%7.79%
GOOGL3.14%3.29%0.15%
MSFT0.41%4.65%4.24%
METAProProPro
CSCOProProPro
PEPProProPro
GILDProProPro
QCOMProProPro
CTASProProPro
INTUProProPro
See all 10 holdings IGA shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IGA or QQQ?

IGA has an expense ratio of 0.97% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IGA or QQQ?

Over the past year IGA returned +16.41% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IGA annualized -0.74% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IGA or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.0% for IGA. Worst drawdown: IGA -72.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both IGA and QQQ?

IGA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IGA and QQQ?

IGA and QQQ share 17 common holdings with a 10.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 323 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IGA or QQQ?

IGA yields 9.62% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so IGA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →