HNDL vs QQQ
HNDL vs QQQ
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 HANDL Index ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HNDL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $631M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.84% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +7.26% | +17.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.96% | +28.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.57% | +24.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.59% | +14.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | STRATEGY SHARES | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 17, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HNDL vs QQQ Performance
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) is a ETF from STRATEGY SHARES and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HNDL returned +11.96% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, HNDL is up 7.26% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.
Over three years, HNDL compounded at +11.57% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.59% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.9% for HNDL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.7% for HNDL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HNDL charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HNDL currently yields 6.84% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HNDL and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HNDL or QQQ?
HNDL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HNDL or QQQ?
Over the past year HNDL returned +11.96% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HNDL annualized +3.44% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HNDL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.9% for HNDL. Worst drawdown: HNDL -23.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HNDL and QQQ?
HNDL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HNDL and QQQ?
HNDL and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HNDL or QQQ?
HNDL yields 6.84% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so HNDL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.