HFGO vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHFGOIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%
AUM$198M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.09%
Holdings48508
YTD Return+8.25%+13.13%
1Y Return+14.09%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.97%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)22.6%15.1%
Max Drawdown-44.6%-56.5%
Fund FamilyHartford FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 9, 2021May 15, 2000

HFGO vs IVV Performance

Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HFGO returned +14.09% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, HFGO is up 8.25% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, HFGO compounded at +23.97% per year against +21.08% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, HFGO has the edge at +8.99% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HFGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for HFGO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HFGO charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

38.9%overlap

HFGO and IVV share 27 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HFGOWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA15.95%7.76%8.19%
AAPL6.34%7.44%1.10%
GOOGL9.12%3.15%5.97%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
GOOGProProPro
See all 10 holdings HFGO shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HFGO or IVV?

HFGO has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.

Which performed better, HFGO or IVV?

Over the past year HFGO returned +14.09% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HFGO annualized +8.99% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, HFGO or IVV?

HFGO has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HFGO -44.6% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both HFGO and IVV?

HFGO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between HFGO and IVV?

HFGO and IVV share 27 common holdings with a 38.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, HFGO or IVV?

HFGO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →