GSLC vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSLCVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.09%0.04%
AUM$14.9B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.95%2.86%
Holdings436568
YTD Return+11.46%+15.45%
1Y Return+20.26%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.67%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.97%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%14.6%
Max Drawdown-33.7%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 17, 2015Nov 10, 2006

GSLC vs VYM Performance

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GSLC returned +20.26% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GSLC is up 11.46% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, GSLC compounded at +19.67% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.97% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GSLC has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GSLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.7% for GSLC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSLC charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSLC currently yields 0.95% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

29.5%overlap

GSLC and VYM share 183 holdings out of 801 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GSLCWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.47%6.47%4.00%
JPM1.33%3.36%2.03%
XOM0.67%2.83%2.16%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
HDProProPro
PGProProPro
CSCOProProPro
CATProProPro
See all 10 holdings GSLC shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSLC or VYM?

GSLC has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GSLC or VYM?

Over the past year GSLC returned +20.26% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GSLC annualized +13.38% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GSLC or VYM?

GSLC has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GSLC -33.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both GSLC and VYM?

GSLC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between GSLC and VYM?

GSLC and VYM share 183 common holdings with a 29.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 801 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSLC or VYM?

GSLC yields 0.95% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →