GSLC vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

GSLC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. GSLC offers more diversification with 426 holdings.

Lower Fees: GSLCHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: GSLC

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGSLCQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.09%0.18%
AUM$14.9B$455.8B
Dividend Yield0.95%0.41%
Holdings436108
YTD Return+9.75%+14.45%
1Y Return+17.80%+24.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.43%+24.19%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.65%+14.49%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%30.6%
Max Drawdown-33.7%-83.0%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 17, 2015Mar 10, 1999

GSLC vs QQQ Performance

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GSLC returned +17.80% while QQQ returned +24.70%. Year to date, GSLC is up 9.75% versus a gain of 14.45% for QQQ.

Over three years, GSLC compounded at +19.43% per year against +24.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.65% and +14.49% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, GSLC has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.9% for GSLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.7% for GSLC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GSLC charges 0.09% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSLC currently yields 0.95% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

46.9%overlap

GSLC and QQQ share 81 holdings out of 448 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GSLCWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA7.43%7.88%0.45%
AAPL7.67%7.46%0.21%
MSFT4.27%4.65%0.38%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
MUProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings GSLC shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GSLC or QQQ?

GSLC has an expense ratio of 0.09% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GSLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GSLC or QQQ?

Over the past year GSLC returned +17.80% vs +24.70% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GSLC annualized +13.23% vs +12.98% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GSLC or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.9% for GSLC. Worst drawdown: GSLC -33.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both GSLC and QQQ?

GSLC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between GSLC and QQQ?

GSLC and QQQ share 81 common holdings with a 46.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 448 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GSLC or QQQ?

GSLC yields 0.95% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GSLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →