GGRW vs SCHD
GGRW vs SCHD
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $8M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +9.15% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.35% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.62% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.06% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GGRW vs SCHD Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GGRW returned +13.35% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, GGRW is up 9.15% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, GGRW compounded at +26.62% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.06% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for GGRW and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $6 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.40% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
GGRW and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 138 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while SCHD charges 0.06%. GGRW is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGRW or SCHD?
Over the past year GGRW returned +13.35% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GGRW annualized +8.19% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GGRW -50.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GGRW and SCHD?
GGRW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and SCHD?
GGRW and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 138 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW yields 0.40% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.