GENT vs VYM
GENT vs VYM
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GENT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $100M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.51% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +0.29% | +15.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +25.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GENT vs VYM Performance
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) is a ETF from Genter Capital Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GENT returned +2.52% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, GENT is up 0.29% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 2.9% for GENT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.9% for GENT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GENT charges 0.38% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $4 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GENT currently yields 4.51% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GENT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 610 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GENT or VYM?
GENT has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GENT or VYM?
Over the past year GENT returned +2.52% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GENT annualized +4.51% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GENT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 2.9% for GENT. Worst drawdown: GENT -2.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GENT and VYM?
GENT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GENT and VYM?
GENT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 610 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GENT or VYM?
GENT yields 4.51% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GENT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.