GENT vs VOO
GENT vs VOO
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GENT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $100M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.51% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.29% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GENT vs VOO Performance
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) is a ETF from Genter Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GENT returned +2.52% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, GENT is up 0.29% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 2.9% for GENT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.9% for GENT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.26. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GENT charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GENT currently yields 4.51% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GENT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 557 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GENT or VOO?
GENT has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GENT or VOO?
Over the past year GENT returned +2.52% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GENT annualized +4.51% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GENT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 2.9% for GENT. Worst drawdown: GENT -2.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GENT and VOO?
GENT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.26, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GENT and VOO?
GENT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 557 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GENT or VOO?
GENT yields 4.51% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GENT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.