GCOR vs VOO
GCOR vs VOO
Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. GCOR offers more diversification with 1058 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCOR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $790M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,741 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.64% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.67% | +19.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.64% | +19.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.78% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 8, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GCOR vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GCOR returned +2.67% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, GCOR is down 0.64% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.
Over three years, GCOR compounded at +3.64% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.78% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs -0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 6.2% for GCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for GCOR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCOR charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCOR currently yields 4.13% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GCOR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCOR or VOO?
GCOR has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GCOR or VOO?
Over the past year GCOR returned +2.67% vs +19.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GCOR annualized -0.72% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GCOR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 6.2% for GCOR. Worst drawdown: GCOR -19.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GCOR and VOO?
GCOR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GCOR and VOO?
GCOR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCOR or VOO?
GCOR yields 4.13% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.