GCOR vs IVV
GCOR vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. GCOR offers more diversification with 1058 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCOR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $790M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,741 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.28% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.05% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.89% | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.68% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 8, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
GCOR vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GCOR returned +2.05% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, GCOR is down 0.28% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Over three years, GCOR compounded at +3.89% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.68% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -0.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.2% for GCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for GCOR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCOR charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCOR currently yields 4.13% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GCOR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCOR or IVV?
GCOR has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GCOR or IVV?
Over the past year GCOR returned +2.05% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GCOR annualized -0.66% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GCOR or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.2% for GCOR. Worst drawdown: GCOR -19.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GCOR and IVV?
GCOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GCOR and IVV?
GCOR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCOR or IVV?
GCOR yields 4.13% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.