FLXR vs VYM
FLXR vs VYM
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLXR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | - | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.81% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 1,519 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +1.35% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.52% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLXR vs VYM Performance
TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLXR returned +4.52% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, FLXR is up 1.35% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 3.0% for FLXR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.9% for FLXR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLXR charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLXR currently yields 5.81% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLXR and VYM share 1 holdings out of 1107 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLXR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.18% | 0.12% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLXR or VYM?
FLXR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLXR or VYM?
Over the past year FLXR returned +4.52% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FLXR annualized +6.89% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLXR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 3.0% for FLXR. Worst drawdown: FLXR -1.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLXR and VYM?
FLXR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLXR and VYM?
FLXR and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1107 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLXR or VYM?
FLXR yields 5.81% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FLXR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.