FLRT vs VOO
FLRT vs VOO
Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLRT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $657M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.77% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 274 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.34% | +11.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.09% | +21.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.90% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.08% | +13.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLRT vs VOO Performance
Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLRT returned +5.09% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, FLRT is up 2.34% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.
Over three years, FLRT compounded at +7.90% per year against +20.86% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.08% and +13.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.44% annualized vs +2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.3% for FLRT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.8% for FLRT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLRT charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLRT currently yields 6.77% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLRT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 681 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLRT or VOO?
FLRT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLRT or VOO?
Over the past year FLRT returned +5.09% vs +21.46% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), FLRT annualized +2.52% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLRT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.3% for FLRT. Worst drawdown: FLRT -25.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLRT and VOO?
FLRT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLRT and VOO?
FLRT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 681 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLRT or VOO?
FLRT yields 6.77% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLRT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.