FFLC vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFLCIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%
AUM$1.2B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.99%1.09%
Holdings111508
YTD Return+11.85%+13.13%
1Y Return+20.30%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.54%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+16.50%+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)16.0%15.1%
Max Drawdown-19.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 2, 2020May 15, 2000

FFLC vs IVV Performance

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFLC returned +20.30% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, FFLC is up 11.85% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, FFLC compounded at +21.54% per year against +21.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.50% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFLC has the edge at +20.14% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for FFLC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFLC charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLC currently yields 0.99% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

41.2%overlap

FFLC and IVV share 73 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 41.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFLCWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA8.38%7.76%0.62%
GOOGL7.78%3.15%4.63%
AAPL3.49%7.44%3.95%
AMZNProProPro
MSFTProProPro
METAProProPro
AVGOProProPro
XOMProProPro
VProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings FFLC shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFLC or IVV?

FFLC has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FFLC or IVV?

Over the past year FFLC returned +20.30% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLC annualized +20.14% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FFLC or IVV?

FFLC has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFLC -19.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FFLC and IVV?

FFLC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between FFLC and IVV?

FFLC and IVV share 73 common holdings with a 41.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFLC or IVV?

FFLC yields 0.99% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →