FDWM vs VXUS
FDWM vs VXUS
Fidelity Womens Leadership ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDWM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $5M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.37% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.55% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.64% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FDWM vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Womens Leadership ETF (FDWM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDWM returned +14.55% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FDWM is up 17.37% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FDWM compounded at +16.64% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, FDWM has the edge at +7.73% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for FDWM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDWM charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDWM currently yields 0.52% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FDWM and VXUS share 4 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FDWM | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSK:LN | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.73% |
| ATZ:CA | 0.95% | 0.02% | 0.93% |
| HBAN | 0.71% | 0.05% | 0.66% |
| KR | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 4 holdings FDWM shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDWM or VXUS?
FDWM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDWM or VXUS?
Over the past year FDWM returned +14.55% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FDWM annualized +7.73% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDWM or VXUS?
FDWM has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FDWM -29.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FDWM and VXUS?
FDWM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDWM and VXUS?
FDWM and VXUS share 4 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDWM or VXUS?
FDWM yields 0.52% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.