FDWM vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFDWMIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%
AUM$5M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.52%1.09%
Holdings82508
YTD Return+17.37%+13.13%
1Y Return+14.55%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.64%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)17.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-29.1%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 15, 2021May 15, 2000

FDWM vs IVV Performance

Fidelity Womens Leadership ETF (FDWM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FDWM returned +14.55% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, FDWM is up 17.37% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, FDWM compounded at +16.64% per year against +21.08% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, FDWM has the edge at +7.73% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FDWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for FDWM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FDWM charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDWM currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

37.8%overlap

FDWM and IVV share 64 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FDWMWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA7.02%7.76%0.74%
AAPL5.91%7.44%1.53%
MSFT7.10%4.57%2.53%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
LLYProProPro
MUProProPro
MAProProPro
GEVProProPro
See all 10 holdings FDWM shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FDWM or IVV?

FDWM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FDWM or IVV?

Over the past year FDWM returned +14.55% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FDWM annualized +7.73% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FDWM or IVV?

FDWM has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FDWM -29.1% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FDWM and IVV?

FDWM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between FDWM and IVV?

FDWM and IVV share 64 common holdings with a 37.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FDWM or IVV?

FDWM yields 0.52% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →