EZM vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. EZM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: EZMMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEZMIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%
AUM$940M$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.21%1.09%
Holdings509508
YTD Return+15.19%+13.31%
1Y Return+24.79%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.28%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.32%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)20.1%15.1%
Max Drawdown-60.6%-56.5%
Fund FamilyWisdomTree InvestmentsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 23, 2007May 15, 2000

EZM vs IVV Performance

WisdomTree US MidCap Fund (EZM) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EZM returned +24.79% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, EZM is up 15.19% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, EZM compounded at +13.28% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.32% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, EZM has the edge at +8.58% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EZM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.6% for EZM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EZM charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EZM currently yields 1.21% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

0.7%overlap

EZM and IVV share 31 holdings out of 976 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EZMWeight in IVVDifference
VTRS1.31%0.03%1.28%
CF1.10%0.03%1.07%
PR0.07%0.62%0.55%
GLProProPro
BENProProPro
DVAProProPro
NCLHProProPro
SJMProProPro
MOSProProPro
ALGNProProPro
See all 10 holdings EZM shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EZM or IVV?

EZM has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EZM or IVV?

Over the past year EZM returned +24.79% vs +24.00% for IVV, so EZM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EZM annualized +8.58% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EZM or IVV?

EZM has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EZM -60.6% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both EZM and IVV?

EZM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between EZM and IVV?

EZM and IVV share 31 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 976 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EZM or IVV?

EZM yields 1.21% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EZM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →