EMTL vs VXUS
EMTL vs VXUS
State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMTL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $67M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.95% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.71% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.23% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.65% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.03% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 13, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMTL vs VXUS Performance
State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMTL returned +1.23% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, EMTL is down 1.71% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMTL compounded at +5.65% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.03% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs +3.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.1% for EMTL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for EMTL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMTL charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMTL currently yields 4.95% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMTL and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7974 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMTL or VXUS?
EMTL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMTL or VXUS?
Over the past year EMTL returned +1.23% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), EMTL annualized +3.11% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMTL or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.1% for EMTL. Worst drawdown: EMTL -22.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMTL and VXUS?
EMTL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMTL and VXUS?
EMTL and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7974 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMTL or VXUS?
EMTL yields 4.95% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so EMTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.