EDGF vs IVV
EDGF vs IVV
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDGF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $495M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.10% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.38% | +22.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | 3 EDGE Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
EDGF vs IVV Performance
3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) is a ETF from 3 EDGE Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDGF returned +2.38% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, EDGF is up 1.10% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.6% for EDGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for EDGF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDGF charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDGF currently yields 3.22% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EDGF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDGF or IVV?
EDGF has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDGF or IVV?
Over the past year EDGF returned +2.38% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EDGF annualized +2.12% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDGF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.6% for EDGF. Worst drawdown: EDGF -1.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EDGF and IVV?
EDGF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDGF and IVV?
EDGF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDGF or IVV?
EDGF yields 3.22% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EDGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.