ECAT vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricECATVYMWinner
Expense Ratio1.43%0.04%
AUM$1.5B$79.0B
Dividend Yield21.30%2.86%
Holdings1,008568
YTD Return+12.96%+15.20%
1Y Return+16.65%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.55%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)17.7%14.6%
Max Drawdown-32.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyBlackRock, Inc. (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionSep 28, 2021Nov 10, 2006

ECAT vs VYM Performance

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECAT returned +16.65% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, ECAT is up 12.96% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, ECAT compounded at +19.55% per year against +17.86% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, ECAT has the edge at +9.47% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ECAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.2% for ECAT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ECAT charges 1.43% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $143 vs $4 annually, a gap of $139 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECAT currently yields 21.30% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

12.2%overlap

ECAT and VYM share 29 holdings out of 1079 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ECATWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO1.45%6.47%5.02%
JPM:US1.17%3.36%2.19%
WMT1.12%2.44%1.32%
JNJProProPro
BACProProPro
HDProProPro
CSCOProProPro
ABBVProProPro
NEEProProPro
CProProPro
See all 10 holdings ECAT shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ECAT or VYM?

ECAT has an expense ratio of 1.43% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $139 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ECAT or VYM?

Over the past year ECAT returned +16.65% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ECAT annualized +9.47% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ECAT or VYM?

ECAT has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ECAT -32.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both ECAT and VYM?

ECAT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ECAT and VYM?

ECAT and VYM share 29 common holdings with a 12.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1079 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ECAT or VYM?

ECAT yields 21.30% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ECAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →