ECAT vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. ECAT offers more diversification with 550 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: ECAT

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricECATIVVWinner
Expense Ratio1.43%0.03%
AUM$1.5B$865.2B
Dividend Yield21.30%1.09%
Holdings1,008508
YTD Return+12.96%+13.13%
1Y Return+16.65%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.55%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)17.7%15.1%
Max Drawdown-32.2%-56.5%
Fund FamilyBlackRock, Inc. (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionSep 28, 2021May 15, 2000

ECAT vs IVV Performance

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ECAT returned +16.65% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, ECAT is up 12.96% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, ECAT compounded at +19.55% per year against +21.08% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, ECAT has the edge at +9.47% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ECAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.2% for ECAT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ECAT charges 1.43% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $143 vs $3 annually, a gap of $140 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECAT currently yields 21.30% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

33.8%overlap

ECAT and IVV share 83 holdings out of 972 unique holdings combined, representing a 33.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ECATWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA4.02%7.76%3.74%
AAPL2.61%7.44%4.83%
MSFT3.85%4.57%0.72%
GOOGProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
See all 10 holdings ECAT shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ECAT or IVV?

ECAT has an expense ratio of 1.43% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $140 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ECAT or IVV?

Over the past year ECAT returned +16.65% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ECAT annualized +9.47% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ECAT or IVV?

ECAT has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ECAT -32.2% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ECAT and IVV?

ECAT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ECAT and IVV?

ECAT and IVV share 83 common holdings with a 33.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 972 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ECAT or IVV?

ECAT yields 21.30% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ECAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →