DMXF vs VOO
DMXF vs VOO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DMXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $979M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.18% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 422 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.88% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | +19.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.30% | +19.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.04% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
DMXF vs VOO Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DMXF returned +22.47% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, DMXF is up 11.88% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.
Over three years, DMXF compounded at +16.30% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.04% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for DMXF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXF charges 0.12% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXF currently yields 4.18% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
DMXF and VOO share 1 holdings out of 900 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DMXF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRK | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXF or VOO?
DMXF has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMXF or VOO?
Over the past year DMXF returned +22.47% vs +19.58% for VOO, so DMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DMXF annualized +11.88% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMXF or VOO?
DMXF has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DMXF -34.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DMXF and VOO?
DMXF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMXF and VOO?
DMXF and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 900 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXF or VOO?
DMXF yields 4.18% while VOO yields 1.09%, so DMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.