DMXF vs IVV
DMXF vs IVV
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DMXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $979M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.18% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 422 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.65% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.28% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.72% | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.30% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
DMXF vs IVV Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DMXF returned +24.28% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, DMXF is up 14.65% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Over three years, DMXF compounded at +17.72% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.30% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, DMXF has the edge at +12.30% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for DMXF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXF charges 0.12% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXF currently yields 4.18% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXF or IVV?
DMXF has an expense ratio of 0.12% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DMXF or IVV?
Over the past year DMXF returned +24.28% vs +24.00% for IVV, so DMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DMXF annualized +12.30% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DMXF or IVV?
DMXF has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DMXF -34.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DMXF and IVV?
DMXF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DMXF and IVV?
DMXF and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXF or IVV?
DMXF yields 4.18% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.